This former practicing attorney asks: In what American tribunal but the U.S. Congress do the triers of fact not see the evidence and hear the witnesses testify under oath?
Once upon a time a Republican American President did something he ought not to have done, from Wikipedia:
Once upon a later time, a Democrat American President did something he ought not to have done, from Wikipedia:
Republicans in the U.S. Congress spent a great deal of taxpayer money on Blowjobgate, which was a flea on an elephant's butt compared to Watergate and Ukrainegate.
Once upon a time a Republican American President did something he ought not to have done, from Wikipedia:
The Watergate scandal was a major federal
political scandal in the United States involving
the administration of President Richard Nixon from
1972 to 1974 that resulted in the end of Nixon's presidency. The scandal
stemmed from the June 17, 1972, break-in of the Democratic National Committee (DNC)
headquarters at the Watergate Office Building in Washington, D.C.,
by five men and the Nixon administration's subsequent attempts to cover up its
involvement in the crime. Soon after the perpetrators were arrested, the press
and the Justice Department discovered
a connection between cash found on them at the time and a slush fund used
by the Nixon re-election campaign committee.[1][2]
Further
investigations, along with revelations during subsequent trials of the burglars
in January 1973, led the House of Representatives to
grant its Judiciary Committee additional
investigation authority to probe into "certain matters within its
jurisdiction,"[3][4] and
the Senate to create a special investigative
committee to look into the scandal. The resultant Senate Watergate hearings commenced
in May 1973. Broadcast "gavel-to-gavel" nationwide, by PBS, the hearings aroused
great public interest.[5] Senators
heard testimony that the president had approved plans to cover up
administration involvement in the Watergate break-in, and learned of the
existence of a voice-activated taping system in the Oval Office.[6][7] Meanwhile,
Nixon's administration resisted its probes, which led to a constitutional crisis.[8]
Several
major revelations and egregious presidential action against the investigation
later in 1973 prompted the House to commence an impeachment process against Nixon in
February 1974.[9] On
July 24, 1974, while the impeachment process was under way, the Supreme Court unanimously
ruled in United States v. Nixon that Nixon was
obligated to release the Oval Office tapes to government investigators. The
tapes revealed that Nixon had conspired to cover up activities that took place
after the break-in and had attempted to use federal officials to deflect the
investigation.[10][11] Shortly
thereafter, the Judiciary Committee approved articles of impeachment against Nixon for obstruction of justice, abuse of power,
and contempt of Congress and reported those
articles to the House of Representatives.
With his complicity in the cover-up made public and his political support completely eroded, Nixon resigned from office on August 9, 1974. It is a virtual certainty that, had he not done so, he would have been impeached by the House and removed from office by a trial in the Senate.[12][13] To date, he is the only American president to have resigned from office. On September 8, 1974, Nixon's successor, Gerald Ford, pardoned him.
With his complicity in the cover-up made public and his political support completely eroded, Nixon resigned from office on August 9, 1974. It is a virtual certainty that, had he not done so, he would have been impeached by the House and removed from office by a trial in the Senate.[12][13] To date, he is the only American president to have resigned from office. On September 8, 1974, Nixon's successor, Gerald Ford, pardoned him.
Once upon a later time, a Democrat American President did something he ought not to have done, from Wikipedia:
The impeachment of Bill Clinton was initiated
on October 8, 1998, when the United States House of
Representatives voted to commence impeachment proceedings
against Bill Clinton, the 42nd president of the United States, for "high crimes and misdemeanors". The
specific charges against Clinton were lying under oath and obstruction of justice. The charges stemmed
from a sexual harassment lawsuit filed against Clinton by Paula Jones and
from Clinton's testimony denying that he had engaged in a sexual relationship
with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.
The catalyst for the president's impeachment was the Starr Report,
a September 1998 report prepared by Independent Counsel Ken Starr for
the House Judiciary Committee.[1]
On December 19, 1998, Clinton became the second American president to be impeached (the first being Andrew Johnson, who was impeached in 1868), when the House formally adopted two articles of impeachment and forwarded them to the United States Senate for adjudication; two other articles were considered, but were rejected.[a] A trial in the Senate began in January 1999, with Chief Justice William Rehnquist presiding. On February 12, Clinton was acquitted on both counts as neither received the necessary two-thirds majority vote of the senators present for conviction and removal from office—in this instance 67. On Article One, 45 senators voted to convict while 55 voted for acquittal. On Article Two, 50 senators voted to convict while 50 voted for acquittal.[3] Clinton remained in office for the remainder of his second term.[4]
On December 19, 1998, Clinton became the second American president to be impeached (the first being Andrew Johnson, who was impeached in 1868), when the House formally adopted two articles of impeachment and forwarded them to the United States Senate for adjudication; two other articles were considered, but were rejected.[a] A trial in the Senate began in January 1999, with Chief Justice William Rehnquist presiding. On February 12, Clinton was acquitted on both counts as neither received the necessary two-thirds majority vote of the senators present for conviction and removal from office—in this instance 67. On Article One, 45 senators voted to convict while 55 voted for acquittal. On Article Two, 50 senators voted to convict while 50 voted for acquittal.[3] Clinton remained in office for the remainder of his second term.[4]
Republicans in the U.S. Congress spent a great deal of taxpayer money on Blowjobgate, which was a flea on an elephant's butt compared to Watergate and Ukrainegate.
This arrived in my email
account last night:
January 26, 2020
|
We’re sending a special edition of the Impeachment Briefing
tonight to tell you about some significant news that The Times broke tonight:
A draft of John Bolton’s new book contains an explosive account on Ukraine
that could change the impeachment trial.
|
In an unpublished
manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security
adviser said that President Trump told him firsthand that he wanted to
continue freezing military aid to Ukraine until officials there helped with
investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens.
|
A draft of his manuscript
was sent to the White House in recent weeks for a standard review process.
You can read our full story on the news here,
and five takeaways from
our reporting.
|
What happened?
|
During a conversation in
August with Mr. Trump, Mr. Bolton mentioned his concern over the delay of
$391 million in security assistance to Ukraine. Mr. Trump replied that he
preferred sending no assistance to Ukraine until officials had turned over
all materials they had about the Russia investigation related to former Vice
President Joe Biden and supporters of Hillary Clinton in Ukraine. (Mr. Trump
frequently lumps together the law enforcement officials who investigated his
campaign’s ties to Russia with Democrats and other perceived enemies, as he
appeared to do with Mr. Bolton.)
Mr. Bolton said that he
warned White House lawyers that Rudy Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer,
might have been leveraging his work with the president to help his private clients.
And he said Secretary of State Mike Pompeo privately acknowledged to him last
spring that Mr. Giuliani’s claims about Marie
Yovanovitch, then the ambassador to Ukraine, had no basis.
|
From Wikipedia:
John Robert Bolton (born
November 20, 1948) is an American attorney, political commentator, Republican consultant, former diplomat
and national security advisor.
Bolton was the United States Ambassador to the United Nations from
August 2005 to December 2006 as a recess appointee by President George W. Bush.[6] He
resigned at the end of his recess appointment in December 2006[7][8] because
he was unlikely to win confirmation from the Senate, of which the Democratic Party had gained control at
the time.[9][10] In later years, Bolton was the U.S. National Security Advisor under the Trump administration from April 2018 to
September 2019.
sloanbashinsky@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment