Wednesday, May 31, 2017

black comedy theater, Key West and beyond - plus, I hope people who think Lucifer is not real, or is the light bearer, or is not messing with people great and ordinary, will get over that thinking, which Lucifer invented

Text message yesterday from "Young Prophet", who, like me, is consciously and regularly in conversation and messed with by angels, and under demonic attack:
"I have as well as family been attacked. Bad shit. You be careful. You woke me up from a dream. Gabriel - he showed me Vulcan and said you must be pure steel and stronger than cast iron, your flame must not waiver and you must undergo the crucible to get what is yours. That is only dream, no spin, that is it. Will call this evening if shit does not continue to hit fan."
Young Prophet has lived in Alabama. 

Vulcan is the cast iron blacksmith statue on "Red Mountain" overlooking Birmingham.

Young prophet had no way of knowing that in my past Vulcan was prominent in my dreams, visions, etc.

Vulcan was on the  homepage of goodmorningbirmingham.com, which Judith Haney got Blue Host to shut down.

A great blacksmith, the Christ, once laid me on his great black anvil in his red hot forge and pounded me with his great black hammer into a black diamond laser sword - August 1994.

I figure Young Prophet's dream applies generally to what the angels are arranging for me to engage, and I figure his dream applies specifically to what is going in Birmingham regarding my father's estate and perhaps Judith Haney.

An email this morning from Young Prophet, including what Archangel Gabriel told him about Lucifer, winds up today's black comedy theater.

Meanwhile, the big league media-entertainment attorney representing Rick Boettger, below, recently filed a motion to be allowed by 16th Judicial Circuit Judge Bonnie Helms, in Key West, to file this pleading in Rick's behalf against Judith Haney:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

JUDITH E. HANEY, an individual,  Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
Case No. 17-CA-000111-K
 v.
RICHARD D. BOETTGER, an individual, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
 _____________________________________/

DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS

As and for this, his Amended Answer (“Amended Answer”) to the “Verified First Amended Complaint” (“Complaint”) filed herein on February 24, 2017, and his Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims against the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Judith E. Haney (“Haney”), Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Richard D. Boettger (“Boettger”) responds as follows:

Since Haney has not separately numbered the paragraphs of her Complaint as required by Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(f), Boettger’s Answers will be responsive to sections of the Complaint, rather then to numbered paragraphs.

ANSWERS

Complaint

Section 1: “VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT”
Admit that Haney has misguidedly brought this action.

Complaint Section 2: “PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE”

Admit.
Filing # 57011649 E-Filed 05/26/2017 04:39:11 PM

Complaint Section 3: “BACKGROUND”

Boettger denies each and every averment in this Section 3 and demands strict proof thereof.

Complaint Section 4: “FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS”

Boettger denies each and every averment in this Section 4 and demands strict proof thereof.

Complaint Section 5: “CAUSES OF ACTION DEFAMATION PER SE, LIBEL PER SE, SLANDER, INVASION OF PRIVACY, INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, AND STALKING”

Boettger denies each and every averment in this Section and demands strict proof thereof.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

1. All of Boettger’s activities complained of in the Complaint are in the pursuit of justice and presumptively privileged under Fla. Const. Art. I § 4, which provides:

§ 4. Freedom of speech and press Every person may speak, write and publish sentiments on all subjects but shall be responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions and civil actions for defamation the truth may be given in evidence. If the matter charged as defamatory is true and was published with good motives, the party shall be acquitted or exonerated.

2. All of Boettger’s activities complained of in the Complaint are in the pursuit of justice and are presumptively privileged under Amendment I to the Constitution of the United States, which provides: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. U.S. Const. Amend. I

3. All of Boettger’s activities complained of by Haney are in the pursuit of justice and are presumptively privileged under Florida’s “Litigation Privilege.”

3 COUNTERCLAIMS NATURE OF COUNTERCLAIMS These Counterclaims (“Counterclaims”) are filed on behalf of Boettger and are filed as claims for:

(1) Malicious Prosecution against Haney;

(2) Abuse of Process against Haney;

(3) Deprivation of Boettger’s Civil Rights By Haney; and

(4) Intentional Infliction of Severe Emotional Distress against Haney.

PARTIES

1. Boettger is an individual resident of the City of Key West in Monroe County, Florida, is over eighteen (18) years of age and is otherwise sui juris.

2. While assertedly a resident of Alabama, Haney has on multiple occasions availed herself of the Circuit Court in and for the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Monroe County, Florida, continues to do so, and is therefore sui juris for purposes of these Counterclaims. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3. Jurisdiction and venue are as stated in the Complaint herein (Complaint, at 1).

FACTS

4. Beginning in late 2016, and continuing until the present, Haney has involved herself in a dispute with Key West resident Sloan Y. Bashinsky, Jr., which dispute resulted in a Complaint being filed by Haney as CA-17-000001-K, assigned to this Court (the “Bashinsky Case”). Since being filed on December 31, 2016, the Bashinsky Case has seen well over two hundred separate filings, “mostly by the Plaintiff [i.e., Haney}.” See this Court’s Sua Sponte Order Striking The Pleadings, filed in the Bashinsky Case on April 28, 2017.

5. Through no fault of his own and apparently because of his non-attorney efforts to protect and assist his fellow journalist Bashinsky (the Defendant in the Bashinsky Case), Boettger was dragged into the Bashinsky Case by virtue of false statements made about him in Haney’s Amended Complaint in the Bashinsky Case, which Amended Complaint was filed on January 7, 2017.

6. In an apparent effort to discourage Boettger’s non-attorney assistance to Bashinsky by intimidating him, Haney filed this action against Boettger on February 5, 2017, claiming DEFAMATION, LIBEL PER SE, AND INVASION OF Haney’s PRIVACY, and the parties have now filed numerous pro se papers in this case.

7. Being named as the Defendant herein has required Boettger to defend himself, though he has requested that the Court permit the parties to settle this matter. See Boettger’s “Motion to Deny Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss; to Defer Court Action Until Plaintiff and Defendant Can Settle out of Court and Countersuit for Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process and Deprivation of Civil Rights”, filed on May 1, 2017.

8. In her campaign to abuse the processes of this Court in order to intimidate and “punish” Boettger, Haney has made numerous frivolous pro se filings, and has gone so far as gratuitously to invade Boettger’s private life with heavy-handed physical service of papers - - even though the Court’s own electronic service function had already made those papers available to Boettger. These physical invasions include service of at least the following:

2/21, at 7:11 pm -- Notice of Intent to Issue Subpoena
2/24, at 6:05 pm -- Notice of Filing First Verified Complaint
3/1, at 9:03 pm -- Notice of Filing Amended Restraining Order
3/6, at 5:51 pm -- Subpoena
3/18, at 4:52 pm -- Deposition and Combined Response
3/22, at 7:41 pm -- Amended Verified Complaint 5

9. On information and belief, Haney intentionally caused said gratuitous, night-time invasions of Boettger’s household in order to upset Boettger (and his spouse) and to discourage Boettger from defending himself and continuing to assist Bashinsky.

10. As the Court can see, many of these unnecessary, gratuitous physical intrusions were conducted after business hours, some after sunset (particularly during winter) when the unsolicited “knock on the door” by a stranger is calculated to cause maximum distress to Boettger’s (and his mate’s) peaceful enjoyment.

11. The bringing of this case by Haney has also resulted in Boettger’s being excluded from his role as a journalist for local publications and blogs (including Key West the Newspaper (KWTN, aka “The Blue Paper”), for which Boettger had written for ten years), some of which have stated that they want to avoid being dragged by the litigious Haney into similarly frivolous cases as a defendant -- a classic instance of “chilling effect”, and a partly successful suppression by Haney of Boettger’s right to free expression.

COUNTERCLAIM

I2. Malicious Prosecution

Paragraphs 1-11 above are incorporated herein as if newly stated.

13. On February 5, 2017, Haney filed an original civil complaint against Boettger to commence this case.

14. Haney was, accordingly, the legal cause of said civil complaint being filed against Boettger.

15. There was no probable cause for said complaint being filed against Boettger.

16. Haney filed said civil complaint with malice against Boettger as “punishment” for his non-attorney assistance to Bashinsky in the Bashinsky Case.

17. Boettger has suffered damage to his peaceful enjoyment and reputation as a result of Haney’s malicious filing of said civil complaint.

WHEREFORE Boettger demands judgment against Haney in an amount to be determined at trial.

COUNTERCLAIM II
Abuse of Process

18. Paragraphs 1-11 above are incorporated herein as if newly stated.

19. Haney’s filing and prosecution of this lawsuit constitute an illegal, improper or perverted use of process by Haney.

20. Haney’s ulterior motive in filing and prosecuting this lawsuit is the improper purpose of silencing and “punishing” Boettger as a non-attorney advocate and journalist supporting his fellow journalist/blogger Bashinsky.

21. As a result of said maliciously filed and prosecuted lawsuit, Haney has damaged Boettger in an amount to be determined at trial.

WHEREFORE Boettger demands judgment against Haney in an amount to be determined by the Court.

COUNTERCLAIM III
Deprivation of Boettger’s Civil Rights

22. Paragraphs 1-11 above are incorporated herein as if newly stated.

23. Boettger. Like all citizens of the State of Florida, enjoys certain freedoms pursuant to Art. I, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution, which, inter alia, guaranties that “Every person may speak, write and publish sentiments on all subjects….”

24. Boettger, like all citizens of the United States, enjoys certain rights under the Constitution of the United States, which guaranties, inter alia, that not even this Court (nor any other government instrumentality) may abridge “the freedom of speech, or of the press….” 7

25. In filing and maliciously pursuing this litigation against Boettger, Haney has attempted to enlist this Court in violating Boettger’s rights under both the Florida Constitution and the United States Constitution.

26. Haney’s filing and malicious prosecution of this lawsuit have impinged upon, and threaten further to impinge upon, Boettger’s said civil right freely to express himself.

27. As a consequence, Boettger has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial.

WHEREFORE Boettger demands judgment against Haney in an amount to be determined by the Court, plus an award of his reasonable costs and attorney fees in defending this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b).

COUNTERCLAIM IV
Intentional Infliction of Severe Emotional Distress

28. Paragraphs 1-11 above are incorporated herein as if newly stated.

29. Haney’s conduct in filing and maliciously pursuing this lawsuit is intentional, in that Haney intended, knew, or should have known that doing so would cause Boettger severe emotional distress.

30. Haney’s conduct in the pursuit of this lawsuit (e.g., in causing papers to be served upon Boettger in the nighttime hours at his home when copies of those same papers had already been served on Boettger through the Court’s electronic service) has been outrageous, has gone beyond all bounds of decency and is intolerable in a civilized society.

31. Said outrageous conduct by Haney has in fact caused emotional distress to Boettger (and to his septuagenarian spouse), and such distress has been severe.

WHEREFORE Boettger demands judgment against Haney in an amount to be determined by the Court after trial.

Dated: May 26, 2017

Respectfully Submitted, 8 /s/ Barry Oliver Chase Florida Bar Number 83666 
Email: barry@chaselawyers.com T
el: (305) 373-7665 Fax: (305) 373-7668 
21 SE 1st Ave., Suite 700 Miami, FL 33131 
Attorney for Defendant Richard D. Boettger

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, on May 26, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using the Court’s electronic filing system, and that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished via court electronic service to all counsel or parties of record.
/s/ Barry Oliver Chase

Here is a link to Lawyer Chase's website, which contains his legal bio and impressive credentials:

http://entertainmentlawyermiami.com/entertainment-law-attorneys/barry-oliver-chase-entertainment-attorney/
Rick Botteger told me he is paying Chase by the hour to defend him and prosecute Haney. Chase's hourly rate is substantial.

I wonder if Judge Bonnie J. Helms, whose sua sponte (on her own motion) order Lawyer Chase quoted, will allow Boettger to counter sue Haney? 
I wonder, because Judge Helms did not rule on my own 1st Amendment defenses, but stuck them from the record in her sua sponte order, as being without apparent merit, vexatious, and unnecessarily burdensome on the court.

If Judge Helms grants Lawyer Chase's motion to counter sue Haney, will the angels then tell me to file a petition to intervene as an alleged co-conspirator necessary party?

I ask, because the angels had me file a petition to intervene as a necessary party in Haney's lawsuit against Naja Girard, but Judge Tim Koenig dismissed, with prejudice, Haney's lawsuit against Naja the same day I filed the motion to intervene. 

Dismissed on the ground that under 1st Amendment, US Constitution, Naja's opinion of Haney was protected free speech. 

I did not see anything on the Clerk of the Court website this morning showing Haney has filed anything disagreeing with Judge Koenig's dismissal of Haney's case against Naja.

Nor does the Clerk of the Court show Haney disagreed with Judge Helms sua sponte order striking all of Haney's pleadings against me, because they contained no apparent merit, were vexatious, and unnecessarily burdened the court.

Excerpts from Haney's amended complaint against Rick Boettger, my interjected thoughts in bold italics:

BACKGROUND

Between December 21, 2016 and the present date, the Defendant has been an active participant in a pernicious malicious campaign between himself and Sloan Y. Bashinsky, Jr., and Naja Girard D’Albisson to uncover compromising information about the Plaintiff for the purpose of publication on the Internet and distribution via email. The campaign is intended to pressure the Plaintiff into dismissing her lawsuits against the Defendant, Sloan Y. Bashinsky, Jr., and Naja Girard D’Albisson. By this action the Plaintiff seeks to recover damages against the Defendant for intentional infliction of emotion distress, libel, malicious defamation, defamation per se, slander, invasion of privacy, and prima facie tort in connection with the tortious conduct of the Defendant.

When someone files a libel lawsuit, that someone puts someone's reputation at issue and the defendant is entitled to learn what that someone's reputation actually is. The defendant does that by searching online for information about that someone, and by speaking with people who know that someone.

On February 15, 2017, the Defendant admitted to his culpability within his motion to strike, answer, and motion to dismiss. Exhibit A, hereto. While hiding behind a false front of piety and propriety and to satisfy his own deranged view of his rights as a so-called “journalist”, the Defendant has admitted to intentional actions designed to cause the Plaintiff intense emotional pain and suffering as well as cause the Plaintiff the expense of bringing this cause of action against him. It is incomprehensible how the Defendant believes, as he suggests in his Motion to Strike, Answer, and Motion to Dismiss, that his actions against the Plaintiff would cause her to dismiss her lawsuit against him, Sloan Y. Bashinsky, Jr., and Naja Girard D’Albisson. If anything, the Defendant’s admissions have served to intensify the Plaintiff’s desire and intent to hold him and his co-conspirators strictly accountable in this court of law.

Fortunately for humanity, judges, not unhappy someones, made unhappy by many things, including suing people who piss them off with sane, honest inquiry, decide the outcome of libel, cyberstalking and invasion of privacy lawsuits.

Upon information and belief, the Plaintiff hereby states that the Defendant has been digging up and publishing the Plaintiff’s 1998 U.S. Bankruptcy Court records; a 1995 Duval County Florida closed case; case information of record in the State of Alabama; defamatory content published on RipOffReport.com, and has investigated the Plaintiff by contacting residents and businesses located in Florida, Alabama, and Arkansas. The Defendant has published and distributed statements alleging that the Plaintiff is “mentally ill” and bases his statements on the opinion of retired U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Mary Scott whose opinion was published in 1999 and is of record via PACER. Judge Scott’s opinion constitutes hearsay and does not rise to admissible evidence.

The Defendant also relies upon the Plaintiff’s former husband, Robert W. Fureigh, of North Little Rock, AR, as a reliable source of information on the status of the Plaintiff’s alleged “mental illness”. Within his Motion to Strike, Answer, and Motion to Dismiss, the Defendant supplied no admissible evidence in defense of his published statements that the Plaintiff is “mentally ill.” The Plaintiff hereby attests that she is not “mentally ill” and has never been diagnosed as being “mentally ill” by anyone at any time. The Defendant’s tortious false allegation in this regard meets the threshold of defamation per se, libel, slander, invasion of privacy, malicious hearsay, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Plaintiff further attests that her former husband, Robert W. Fureigh, has never been told by any physician, psychiatrist, mental health worker, marriage counselor, that the Plaintiff is “mentally ill” and has never been told that the Plaintiff was diagnosed as being “mentally ill”. The Plaintiff attests that her former husband has had no contact with the Plaintiff since 1994, and has no knowledge of her. The Plaintiff has hired legal counsel to file claims against Robert W. Fureigh in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Little Rock, AR, so as to require him to supply proof to back up his false claims that the Plaintiff has ever been diagnosed as being “mentally ill”.

Judge Mary D. Scott's written reported opinion is about as much hearsay as the written reported opinion of the US Supreme Court's New York Times v. Sullivan, which set the standard to which newsmedia are held in what they report about public figures. I flat out proved before Judge Bonnie Helms on March 31 this year, that Judith E. Haney of Leeds, Alabama, is a public figure. I proved it via Haney's own online publishings (boastings) about herself, which Judge Helms accepted as evidentiary exhibits in Haney's lawsuit against me. I proved it through Haney's extensive litigation history, which alone made her a public figure. Here is what Judge Mary D. Scott wrote in her court order about Haney's mental health:


http://www.leagle.com/decision/1999670238BR432_1616/IN%20RE%20HANEY

Click on that link to read Judge Scott's full order, and learn how much fun Judge Scott had with Judith Eloise Haney.

Bankruptcy No. 98-41169 S. Adversary No. 98-4059.

238 B.R. 432 (1999)
In re Judith Eloise HANEY. Robert Fureigh, Plaintiff, v. Judith Eloise Haney, Defendant.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.

"The debtor testified that she has mental health problems. The Court file in the case, this adversary proceeding, and the conduct of this trial, reveal the credibility of this statement. She testified that she needs therapy and that she has been urged by various doctors to seek such assistance. While she previously had customers, she testified that she had effectively "driven" them away. She even believes that she may have suffered some sort of brain damage a decade ago. While the debtor introduced no supporting documentation or other evidence of her disabilities, the Court can readily believe she has been repeatedly urged to seek professional mental care."


That is a matter of public record. Anyone can find it by googling "Judith Eloise Haney". 



IN RE HANEY | 238 B.R. 432 (1999) | Leagle.com

www.leagle.com/decision/1999670238BR432_1616/IN%20RE%20HANEY


Judith Eloise Haney, Defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge. This Cause came before the Court for .

As can anyone find this RipOff report by googling "Judith Eloise Haney": 



Ripoff Report | Judith Haney is a scam artist Complaint Review ...

www.ripoffreport.com/.../judith-haney.../judith-haney-is-a-scam-artist-usnewslinkcom...


Jan 16, 2017 - I was trying to purchase the domain name http://usnewslink.com from its owner Judith Haney. After several weeks of negotiations, we agreed on ...

Haney did not attempt legal action against RipOff or the person who made the complaint until after I pointed out in posts at my websites that she had not taken legal action. She then filed a lawsuit in Birmingham, which looked to me like it was for show, but perhaps it will go somewhere. The RipOff allegation is severe, because it claims a man paid Haney for her website - http://www.usnewslink.com/xarchive.htm -  

and Haney kept his money and did not turn over her website to him. The website at which Haney boasts of herself being a public figure, nationally recognized journalist, commentator, etc.  Don't take my word, open this link and see for yourself. Haney used the name Judi Jordan, then. 


When I first learned Haney claimed she had taken legal action against Robert Fureigh, who had approached me on his own, not because of Rick Boettger, I called Robert. He said, as far as he knew, Haney had taken no legal action against him. I called Robert again this morning and left a voicemail. He sent me a Facebook message just a bit ago saying, so far, he has not heard from Haney or any attorney representing her. What he wrote to me about Haney's mental health was scandalous, if it were not true. Multiple personality disorder. Acute persecution complex. Why didn't Haney sue Fureigh? She sued her own Alabama city's city attorney for libel, for his simply telling me that Haney had a bad reputation where she lives, Leeds, Alabama; and that she is a vexatious litigator, she sics police on people she does not like, she keeps running away families who buy the home across the street from her, she is not liked in the nearby Birmingham, Alabama courts.

When considering the depravity of the Defendant’s lies about the Plaintiff, the fact that he has published and distributed his lies about the Plaintiff, the fact that he has relied upon hearsay in support of his publishing’s and distribution of his lies about the Plaintiff, the court should well understand the negative impact the Defendant’s unlawful actions have had upon the Plaintiff’s overall physical and emotional health as she is placed in the untenable position of having to defend herself against the lies of dishonest and unscrupulous people like the Defendant and his co-conspirators who are bent on harming and harassing the Plaintiff from a distance over the Internet. The Plaintiff is already disabled by a heart attack she suffered on January 2, 2017, and is now, by necessity, being required to deal with the Defendant’s lies about her as well as his ongoing harassment, stalking, defamation, libel, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and invasion of her privacy. The Plaintiff submits that no citizen should be subjected to such abject sadistic cruelty at the hands of anyone, much less a stranger like the Defendant who has never had any dealings with the Plaintiff.

Haney's alleged but not yet proven near fatal heart attack came a few days after she sued me on December 30, 2016. If Haney actually had a near fatal heart attack, it was karma for suing me. If Haney actually had a near fatal heart attack, she could not have filed, nor would her doctor have allowed her to file, as many oceans and mountains of pleadings as she filed against me, and also the lawsuits against Rick Boettger and Naja Girard, and against another friend of mine in the Florida Keys, and against the Leeds city attorney, and against four other people in Leeds, according to the city attorney, and against her neighbor across the street in Leeds, and against other people. The threat of all that suing threatens to kill Haney regardless of the condition of her heart.

The Defendant’s acts of harm against the Plaintiff would shock the conscience of civilized society and no reasonable person would believe that his acts of harm against the Plaintiff were warranted for any reason. The Defendant’s accusations against the Plaintiff that she is “mentally ill” constitutes defamation, libel, intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, and slander. The Defendant has stated that he has a right to investigate and publish compromising information about the Plaintiff because she is a “public figure”. The Defendant claims he has a right to dig up dirt about the Plaintiff because she “ran for mayor”. The Plaintiff has never been on any ballot for any office. The Plaintiff considered running for office in the past and abandoned her interest when a well-qualified person ran for office thereby allowing the Plaintiff to support a worthy candidate. The Plaintiff is not a “public figure” by any definition and even if she were, she has rights which the Defendant has repeatedly violated in a most public, provocative, manner.  

The Defendant’s rights to free speech extend to the end of his nose and does not grant him any right to violate and intrude upon the rights of others. Keeping in mind that the Defendant does not have any personal knowledge of the Plaintiff and relies solely on hearsay, the Defendant’s failure in his duty of care to ascertain the truth of his statements about the Plaintiff rise to the level of defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, stalking, and harassment, and invasion of privacy.

What is a person's reputation, but what a person says and does, and what other people say about that person? What other people say about a person is hearsay.

As an example of the Defendant’s actions taken against the Plaintiff, on January 4, 2017, the Defendant emailed Bashinsky the following: “I’ll be stepping in here, Sloan. Naja, email or phone me if I don’t elucidate by 10 AM Thursday. I think we have to stop this Haney.” And as a further example of the Defendant’s actions taken against the Plaintiff, on January 4, 2017, Bashinsky published the following about the Defendant’s actions: “Rick Boettger already had done an alacourtaccess.com search, and had come up with 5 criminals, probably misdemeanor, charges in Alabama counties against Judith Eloise Haney, DOB 12/XX/1944, Soc. Sec. No. XXX-XX-X663. 24 civil actions filed in Alabama county courts by Judith E. Haney. 1 civil case filed by Judith Eloise Haney. 5 civil cases filed by Judith Haney. 26 of those civil cases were filed in county o1, which is Jefferson County, which is Birmingham, lying just west of Leeds, which is in Saint Claire County.” And, as a follow up, the Defendant emailed Bashinsky that the Plaintiff had a “bad check charge” and “five criminals” against her. The Defendant failed in his duty of care to obtain a certification of disposition of the Duval County Florida Circuit Court which shows the case closed in 1995, and he also failed to state that the “criminals” were traffic tickets spanning over a period years.

Boettger stepped in by filing an amicus curae (friend of the court) 1st Amendment brief, in my behalf, which Judge Bonnie Helms dismissed because the case was not on appeal.

As a further example of the Defendant’s actions taken against the Plaintiff, he published and emailed defamatory information contained in a RipOffReport about the Plaintiff, which Bashinsky has published over forty times on the Internet and emailed to hundreds of recipients. It is important to point out that the Defendant does not know the Plaintiff and has never had any dealings with her. Whatever malice and hatred the Defendant harbors against the Plaintiff is anchored in the utterances, publishing’s, and emailing’s of Bashinsky and that of Naja Girard d’Albisson. Within the Defendant’s Motion to Strike, Answer and Motion to Dismiss lies the clearest, most convincing, evidence of his intent to inflict emotional distress, to slander, defame, libel, and harass the Plaintiff by going back twenty-two years to find close case records. More specifically, in including Exhibit 4, the Defendant failed to also include a certified disposition of the captioned case that shows the check was paid and the case was closed in 1995. In deciding to publish and distribute Exhibit 4, the Defendant had a duty of care to supply the disposition of the case so as to avoid misleading the reader. However, the Defendant’s rules of fairness do not exist. He has no personal ethical code, he has no sense of decency, and he has no respect for the law and the rights of others.

With respect to the Defendant’s including Judge Mary Scott’s statements about the Plaintiff inside of her ruling, the Defendant failed to obtain Judge Scott’s affidavit in support of her published statements. The Defendant copied and pasted Judge Scott’s statements for one purpose: to libel, defame, and malign the Plaintiff and to inflict emotional distress upon her. Recently the Plaintiff contacted the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Little Rock, Arkansas, advising the chief judge of the Defendant’s exploitation and abuse of the court’s official documents. The Plaintiff received a response which stated that regrettably the court could do nothing about the fact that Judge Scott’s statements were published on the Internet or that her statements were being misused in this court by the Defendant and his co-conspirators. The Plaintiff was advised to hire counsel to address the Defendant’s abuse and mishandling of public records and to do so expeditiously to avoid further harm and harassment to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has also advised Judge Mary Scott of the Defendant’s misuse and exploitation of her statements and requested that she take steps to ensure that her statements are not exploited for nefarious purposes by the Defendant.

Because the Defendant has no personal knowledge of the Plaintiff, it makes it all the more reprehensible that he would undertake actions to misappropriate U.S. Bankruptcy Court Records, State of Florida Court Records, and State of Alabama Court Records in furtherance of his nefarious purposes. In an unrelenting effort to harass, threaten, and intimidate the Plaintiff, the Defendant continues to harass her, to intimidate her, to invade her privacy, to stalk her, to obstruct the Plaintiff’s safety and security of her home in Alabama and to do so with one purpose in mind: to blackmail the Plaintiff into dismissing Plaintiff’s civil claims against him and his coconspirators. At the heart of the Defendant’s conspiratorial actions lies an unwritten agreement between himself, Sloan Young Bashinsky, Jr, Naja Girard d’Albisson, and those associated with them, to publish and cause to be published defamatory, libelous, statements, malicious hearsay, and false stories that accuse the Plaintiff of committing crimes, of being mentally ill, of having a bad reputation, and other false and fraudulent allegations of wrong doing alleged to have been committed by the Plaintiff.

The co-conspirators Boettger, Bashinsky, and Girard d’Albisson consider themselves above the law and have no fear of the lawful consequences of their unlawful conduct. The co-conspirators view their unlawful tactics as a fast track to the Plaintiff’s dismissing her lawsuits filed against them in the Monroe County Florida Circuit Court and are willing to undertake any unlawful act to accomplish their goals, including inciting the Plaintiff’s neighbors to keep her under surveillance and report to them her whereabouts at all times.

When Judge Helms, sua sponte, struck Haney's pleadings against me, without prejudice, Haney moved to dismiss that lawsuit, without prejudice, instead of appealing Judge Helm's sua sponte order. I had nothing to do with the sua sponte order, which dismissed all of my defensive pleadings, as well.

The Plaintiff hereby states that no amount of denial will supplant the prima facie evidence set forth inside of their combined Internet publishing’s and inside of their various responses to the pending claims against each of them in the Monroe County Circuit Court. Without regard for the legal consequences of their unlawful acts of harm perpetrated against the Plaintiff, the Defendant and his co-conspirators intend to proceed against the Plaintiff until the Plaintiff acquiesces to their blackmail. The Plaintiff intends to show via the Defendant’s telephone and email records the extent to which Defendant and his co-conspirators have sought to “dig up dirt” and publish compromising information about her on the Internet.

Haney should stand in front of a mirror and read all of this to herself, as the person who put it all into motion. Haney should sue herself.

Therefore, while the Plaintiff expects the co-conspirators to destroy all of the indictable evidence in their possession and control, they will not be able to destroy the permanent record preserved by their Internet Service Providers, Internet hosts, Google, cell phone and land line records, emails and Internet postings. And, the Plaintiff intends to introduce tangible evidence of the Defendant’s wrongdoing perpetrated against her via his telephone and email records.

The only conspiracy I am in with Rick Boettger and Naja Girard is to bring out the TRUTH. We three, and Naja's husband Arnaud, have been in a truth-digging conspiracy about quite a few subjects for quite a few years. Judith Eloise Haney is just one of those inquiries.
Today's next black comedy relief was instigated yesterday by a British expat, who made Key West his home many years ago.
If you are frightened to say you like our President, What is it saying about the community you're living in? and are you really living in an open minded democracy?
Comments
Jody Giblo Im not but people hate me for it i got people in my family blocking my comments

Karen Hirst Wow Jody Giblo those are some cruel people...
Karen Hirst I am not frightened to say Trump is my President! After all Donald J Trump is the President Of The United States Of America 🇱🇷 like it or not!!!
Sheel Sheelman Only in a fascist society does one have to keep silent about one's opinion.
Karen Hirst Very true! I am definitely an opinionated woman!
Steve King Nobody's frightened. 
Nobody likes him.
Jane Mcneely Sheel Sheelman
Sheel, just saw a older clip about this very thing. The centrist conservative was trying to explain to the liberal ( who couldn't even define the term) that, in essence, the not-too-far left have CREATED the fascist state they apparentl
y so abhor. She was stuck on, " Glad to have you talk with us tonight," I think. Typical lib " professor.". Just think, that word used to mean something. Soon people will be shouting out " you...neuroscientist" or, " you filthy astronomer" as 
insults....but I digress. SHE "believed" that fascist States are ONLY formed by the govt!
Crystal Smith I dislike trump with every ounce of my body. I'm not afraid to say it. He's absolutely gross and offensive and I'm imbarrised that he won. It was not by popular vote ..... I don't neceisarily want him impeached bc then we got racist ol Vice pres to look to. But as a women with a daughter I can't stand the man.
Jane Mcneely Crystal Smith: I value your opinion, though do not agree. My point is two-fold: 
1. Just a suggestion. Read about "popular vote" and why our founding fathers identified it's inherent dangers to a democratic republic.
2. I value anyone's reasonably
 inoffensive, nonviolent statements, though I may disagree, and even if I believe them to be invalid, and I value even more the freedoms so many take for granted, that permit us to have this exchange. I do wonder, though, where/how you formed the opinions that both our President and Vice President are racist?0ne statement, or five, made two months ago, or ten? Did you ever hear the verified tape of the DNC, including the female Clinton, laughing at how they had "used" minorities so successfully? Ever heard both Obama and his wife espouse their hatred of whites? Do those statements, to you, mean that they are racist? ( I am just thinking out loud, wondering about your logic).
Sloan Bashinsky Obama and Hillary were/are shapeshifters: whatever they hope would get them votes from the middle and left, they were it. We are better off without them. As for what we got instead, we can thank the people who wanted Hillary instead of Bernie Sanders, or some other actually decent Democrat. Here's what we got instead, and he has probably 30-40 million white male worshippers who can be viewed in similar light: https://youtu.be/-WqJkWntgSg . In just 10 or so seconds, he showed us the truth that I doubt will set us free, but it at least is there for anyone to see.

A number of times I published that Donald Trump and Judith Haney have a lot in common. Haney did not sue me for that, so I figure she took it as a high compliment.

Young Prophet's Gabriel dream:
Dear Sloan: I had a dream last night, involving a couple things.

I was in a desert surrounded by rocks and there was a pond clear water in it.

The angel Gabriel descended from Heaven and played a tune on his horn. He kind of fucks with me, and he asked: "Do you prefer Louis Armstrong ?"

I said no but I didn't think mortal ears were meant for what he played for me.

He told me if I thought that I would need a seat because he had a few things to say.

First he told me of a woman, I told you her name, Spirit Walker. He stated that she needed to follow her own path. He showed her feet in red clay, common to North GA. Upstate SC, Western NC, East TN, and North Alabama. He said that home is not dictated by desire but often by fate. I told you the rest and I just need to get this typed quick. You add in anything you remember. But he gave me her name. 

My north Georgia friend in shaman training, who texted me yesterday that she can't take it any more up there and wants to come to Key West, which never worked out for her in the past and I cannot deal with her being here again, and I told her that yesterday. There was no way Young Prophet could know one of my friend's email handles used to be "spirit walker".

He then told me that you needed to beware of anyone under the sway of Lucifier, that although he was once the Son of the Morning Star, and more beautiful than all angels, hubris and greed and his own arrogance was his fall, along with the 1/3 of Heaven that fell. He said in reality Lucifer got what he wanted- to rule. And Lucifier tempts those with vanity by offering power, knowledge, and esteem. He said you must becareful of anyone associated with Lucifer because he only brings evil and any attachment would be of an evil nature. He also said you must watch from all sides as everything is linked. He took a pebble and skipped it though the top of the pond water and there were ripples and suddenly the water was muddied and corrupted. He said that is the nature of Lucifer.  Darkness and corruption.

Also, I told you about Dad. My niece visited and she is 1 year and 9 months old. Two small welts appeared on her left leg. One developed into the shape of a V. That really bothered me, and neither neosporin nor benadry spray would do anything. While I was taking care of her, I got out a bottle of blessed oil and blessed water- I washed her feet, and the applied the water and oil- the mosquito bites that had itched and bothered her for days were gone in 15-20 minutes. 

On the telephone, he told me of prayer clearing up an unexplainable inflammation in his father's knee.

You know my memory is still fucked so anything else I mentioned please add it in. I'm just trying to get this done quick. 

Evil is very real, people are in denial. Evil is at the very top of this country to the people beside us in the community. We see it in the death of respect for our fellow man and the absence of mere common courtesy.

Bye for now my friend, I hope we get to talk and stay safe.

Young Prophet's memory is still fucked from a demonic entity hitting him in the back and in the back of the head with a hole, which caused him to fall to the ground and bust his scalp wide open and create a major concussion. I recommended he find an osteopath or a chiropractor, who did cranial plate manipulation, which M.D. doctors say is impossible, but it's not. I know how to do it. Young Prophet told me today a chiropractor helped him a lot by resetting his cranial plates, after which the scab and wound on his scalp healed very fast, but he still is suffering depression. I made another suggestion for a chiropractor or osteopath to do. Perhaps he needs to pray for help, also.

sloanbashinsky@outlook.com


No comments:

Post a Comment